I love homework. But I didn’t always. I used to hate homework. I hated it as a student, and I hated it as a teacher. I hated it for all the reasons it is now questioned by education researchers. Homework at the elementary level is usually:
- Busywork (for teachers and students)
- If un-differentiated: too easy for some students, too hard for others
- If differentiated: unbearably complicated and time-consuming for teachers
- Stressful for families
- Graded too slowly or infrequently to give students valuable feedback
- A poor form of assessment
- Something we (and I mean all of us: teachers and students and families) do only because we have to, or because we think we should, or because other people think we should.
I am also really skeptical of the idea that homework at the elementary level teaches study skills in and of itself. Now, if you put into place a real system for programmatically teaching children to study at home and at school and use homework strategically to reinforce that system, well, ok then. But usually, people expect that just by giving kids homework, they will learn study skills. Instead, I think kids learn how to procrastinate, how to put up a good fight with their parents, and how to put as little effort into their work as possible in order to get it done quickly.
I tried all kinds of traditional homework systems: weekly packets, daily assignments, even differentiated homework that involved making different packets for several different groups of students (which, by the way, is insane). And then I went to the Skillful Teacher, learned about effective effort, and decided there had to be a better way.
I asked myself, what if homework was really valuable? Better yet, what if homework was life-changing? What if it could teach students — prove to students — that with effective effort and time, they could achieve anything? Continue reading